That depends on your definition of wilderness. Is wilderness where
no mark of man exists?
Near earth orbit
is littered with space junk. The moon has foot prints, tire tracks, and
abandoned astro-gear that millennia may not erase. Even the outer edge of our
solar system has dying radioactive probes marking man’s conquest for more space
and more knowledge.
If wilderness does not mean there is no evidence of man,
then what is its definition?
The Wilderness Act of 1964 say in part “A wilderness …is hereby recognized as an area where the earth and
community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who
does not remain.”
So, according to this definition, as long as man does not
control the plant and animal life nor the landscape, and he does not live
there, it is wilderness.
Following this definition, just inside the east
entrance to the Everglades National Park is almost wilderness. At night you can
see the city lights, airplanes circle in their approach to Miami, you can smell
the sugar cane refinery, and you can hear the farm tractors in nearby fields.
Thousands of people drive the blacktop road to Flamingo every year, but that
does not disqualify it from being called wilderness under this definition.
However, the fact that rangers live within the park, as per this definition, disqualifies it as
wilderness.
The definition does not say
there should be no evidence of man, but that there is no control by man.
That
eliminates the National Forests that are manipulated by silviculturists to
produce the best wood for their patron lumber companies. That eliminates most
National Parks because the Civilian Conservation Corps built trails and manipulated
streams and build roads to allow the masses to experience a controlled nature
with instinct modified wildlife.
The
thousands of miles of the Colorado, Missouri, Mississippi, and Ohio rivers have
been controlled by man for nearly a century, but you can still find wild places
along all of them.
Blog Index
Blog Index
No comments:
Post a Comment